https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/number-of-registered-voters-by-state
For Wisconsin and Michigan I got them off state run .gov websites, but I've clicked so many the last two days trying to sift through the nonsense it'd be impossible to find again.
And then we're still left with only one of two remedies. SCOTUS takes no action for whatever reason. SCOTUS rules new election.
If they can show that corrupted ballots exceed one candidates lead over the other, they could throw those out then require a recount. But that would happen before SCOTUS, possibly. Trump's people are going to be looking for registrations and other info to invalidate those ballots and that's state level issues.
Too many things don't add up.
https://twitter.com/fleccas/status/1324375754814218240
Having the application received and approved and shipped out and received and filled and mailed back and received by the polling station in one day tells me someone in the elections commission did that on the down low.
Two judicial options:
- SCOTUS throws out several hundred thousand votes giving PA and the election to Trump
What do you think the immediate reaction to this would be from Democrats? That reaction is enough to make Roberts flip and hide behind some jackass sense of need to protect the establishment, trust in the process, blah blah blah. I lean the way of saying Kavanaugh and Barrett would join Roberts, and make some half-assed ruling about no proof of fraud during the time observers were not present. So judicial restraint requires them not to toss the ballots.
And keeping in mind that districts and counties tend to vote predictably for one party or the other, what do you think would occur once it is established that getting your poll watcher barred or even just obstructed means those votes get tossed? Almost absolute anarchy every election.
- SCOTUS rules new presidential election, if that is even possible for POTUS.
That will require absolute proof of widespread fuckery. The easiest most glaring proof of that, in my mind, is in Michigan. Essential Fleccas has a dead person who applied for a mail-in ballot, had the application processed and approved, the ballot was mailed out, filled out, and return by mail all in the same day. The fastest you can have a piece of mail delivered is next day, and that was delivered twice in one day. That was done by someone somewhere in the elections commission organization. So that calls into question the whole thing in Michigan because part of the EC is participating in the fuckery. In Pennsylvania, there's clear proof of dead people voting, among other things, the question will be whether or not that suggests a need to revote even if you can't prove the vote difference falls within the margin of fraud.
The up side is that Pennsylvania couldn't conceivably do mail-in voting due to constitutionally mandated inauguration day. But to further poop on your cereal, ACB could have prevented a large portion of the problem. https://lawandcrime.com/2020-election/amy-coney-barrett-doesnt-participate-in-pennsylvania-republicans-challenge/ She bowed to pressure and said she didn't have a few hours to read the brief. Her first act was to stab Trump in the back, and I can guarantee that someone told Trump she wouldn't rule that way before he nominated her.
https://data.pa.gov/Government-Efficiency-Citizen-Engagement/2020-General-Election-Mail-Ballot-Requests-Departm/mcba-yywm Over 1600 people over the age of 100 requested a mail in ballot for this election just in Pennsylvania.
This isn't even debatable.
It really isn't reasonable. Possible fraud isn't going to be enough to get a new election. If they can show enough dead people voted, ballots were destroyed, or fraudulent ballots were used in some of these states, that might get some form of judicial remedy. Otherwise prepare for bad news. The courts are not going to toss out hundreds of ballots because poll watchers were not there if those ballots appear legit upon scrutiny.
There is evidence, it's why the GOP had to get the order locally then get it repeated by the SCOP then repeated by Alito again. It isn't just that it wasn't being followed, the issue is that officials who just sit in an office made no attempt to verify it was being followed, while claiming it was.