I'm sorry to rain on the parade, but Mike Lindell's 'Absolute Truth' just doesn't make any sense from a technical stand point. Yes, this is my first post and I know it will probably be downvoted to hell, but I think it needs to be pointed out. I applaud Mr. Lindell for his effort, but I think he's being swindled to present easily debunked information so he can be discredited.

The big proof in the video, starting at 1:36, is all based on a spreadsheet supposedly showing foreign "hacks into the election" compiled by "cyber security experts".

Bottom line is, there is no way for a 3rd party to somehow "monitor" this type of internet traffic without access to either the sending computer or the receiving computer, especially with the detail in the spreadsheet.

An accurate analogy would be this:

Say California represents China (haha), and a documented "hack" is someone driving from California to Georgia. These anonymous experts have somehow figured out:

• How to monitor every car driven from California to Georgia, including its license plate and departing location
• Determine where that car drove to
• Determine whether the person in that car was let in the door at the destination
• Determine what they talked about inside the destination.

It's just not possible. Even if the spreadsheet was accurate, there is no explanation of how a successful connection between a foreign computer and US computer correlates to a loss of votes for trump unless they tied that in with precinct vote tallies.

I also tested some of the IP addresses shown in the video at 1:38 in the video and they don't match to what is being listed:

Example: 66.96.149.31 listed as target: Georgia: Calhoun County Election, ns lookup reports the IP Address is actually Burlington MA 23.185.0.1 listed as target: Georgia: Dekalb County Election, ns lookup reports the IP Address is from San Franscisco.

Yes, I understand I.P. address may be dynamic and may have changed since then, but most election boards / govt agencies are going to have static IPs set up that rarely change.

Bottom line, this spreadsheet is utter crap. Nobody could know the information reported, and it looks like some of the reported information is false anyways. All the other pretty charts and animations based on it are useless because the source can't be trusted.

If I am wrong, i welcome any technical explanation to any of this. I believe the election was stolen, but this doesn't help prove anything and I hate to see Mike's time and effort wasted on garbage.