We're not so far removed from the past as we like to think we are: these are raiding parties, something common a few hundred years ago, but absent in recent memory. There is nothing new under the sun.
Sorry, I don't like Pence, but I also don't believe communist lies.
Instead of just arresting the people causing the violence, they're going to impose martial law, but call it "cracking down on gangs"
anyone who is screaming is:
- alive
- breathing
so check the next person.
Of course it is, no one waters their lawn like that
"Look ma! I'm centrally directing the economy!"
lmao
although after reading TFA maybe it's just because of the actor strike
and SEIU
and AFGE
Fun fact: they don't care if you pay it or not. They count it as debt, put it in the asset column, and spend it anyway.
Yes, subjugated enemy populations were regularly enslaved. It's like you have no idea how the world works. "Inferiority" has nothing to do with it.
Slavery is what happens to people when they lose in war. The slave markets of Rome were perpetually filled with the spoils of war. The Greeks, Mongols, Persians, every powerful nation enslaved the defeated and sold them for treasure. African warlords were no different.
Before prison, there was slavery. It never ended in the Middle East and Africa, and it can easily return to the rest of the world.
What has been, that will be; what has been done, that will be done. Nothing is new under the sun!
the enemy identification instinct is only concerned with danger. you speak of inferiority because it is required for your academic argument. but war is not academic, it is war and that's where this instinct comes from.
Racism takes the premise that one race is on average superior to another race in some regard
This is false. "Racism" is the term used to disarm natural friend-or-foe identification instincts.
Since your premise is false, nothing else you said matters.
plot twist: pic is the person that put up the posters
Multimillion taxpayer laundered dollar plan
With the billions of Ukraine war dollars, and the yet-to-come trillions of reconstruction dollars, this is what everything is going to be for our entire lives: social movements funded by the aristocracy.
The government is going to be majority staffed by blacks that have been trained to hate whites, are unfireable, rich, have 80 IQ, are in their positions for life, and have easy access to government funded lawyers.
Future looks bright
Don't ask about the theme, ask who is promoting the theme
They like to invent colloquialisms for "black violence" so people don't notice the problem
"Teen takeover"
"Knockout game"
"Carjacking"
"Home invasion"
"Asian hate crime"
"Peaceful protest"
There's no bravery in her position, even though she acts like it. Clausewitz defines bravery as the ability to act in the presence of danger. So let's see the possibilities:
- Oppose Trump + Trump Wins ➡️ nothing happens to you
- Oppose Trump + Trump Loses ➡️ nothing happens to you
- Support Trump + Trump Wins ➡️ nothing happens to you
- Support Trump + Trump Loses ➡️ reeducation camp
There's zero danger in opposing Trump, and so it is impossible to be courageous by opposing him.
the nature of the sovereign requires it possess a monopoly on the use of violence.
because power derives from The People of the United States, not its leaders, the 2A affirms the sovereign rights of the people to use force
if/when the government removes the ability to use force from the people, it will have signalled the people are no longer sovereign.
"I want to align myself with a marketing stereotype of men/women created by advertising agencies"
During the 1300's and 1400's there was a cult known as the Flagellants that would beat themselves with whips. It was thought the Black Death was punishment from God and their actions were penance.
This is identical. Not just analogous, but identical. For the sins of racism they perceive to plague mankind, they publicly chastise themselves in repentance.
What has been, that will be; what has been done, that will be done. Nothing is new under the sun!
Controlling borders is the primary task for all sovereigns. To fail at this first task is to fail at all others.
All you're doing is giving an example of a sovereign performing its secondary duties inadequately.
The character of a government is irrelevant if it serves its people well. A government that fails to protect its borders is not just failing its people, but ceasing to exist.
Wait wait, I'm not used to action, you gotta tell me a BOMBSHELL will DEVASTATE in the next few days
Questions with obvious answers