My first thought too - now who's going to pay for his security detail. He's too young to own a PDW... better be with someone else who's packin at all times.
Joepedo
Will never see this and not lol. Jesus after the kid-touching video what the fuck were they thinking?
No dumb bastard ever won a war by going out and dying for his country. He won it by making some other dumb bastard die for his country.
General George S. Patton
Seems like they are destroying evidence. Kemp knows 20% or more of those mail in ballots for Biden are bullshit. He is literally trying to hide it.
See, and in court, at least, in a pesticide residue lab taking results to court - a break in traceability like that (you know, destroying raw data) would get your result laughed out of court. If the same standards are applied to our federal election, as I hope they will be (not holding my breath), this is an open and shut case.
We got assholes moving in from blue states that are hell bound to royally fuck up this state.
Andrew Yang specifically said he was going to just for the run-offs and encouraged others to. That should have landed him in court explaining himself but y'know, the "just us" system failed again.
That's what pisses me off. The Dekalb CEO called the recount an audit. Fuck no it wasn't an audit - there was no chain of custody examination, no proof of traceability, you didn't even fucking attempt signature matching, you just counted the votes that the machine counted, but by hand. And even then you found >12k votes between 2 counties.
I've worked in accredited facilities, and if an auditor did the piss poor job GA is doing and called it an audit they'd be fired and frankly, (because you usually pay for an audit from an Accreditation Body) I'd demand another audit. The whole point is to prove your results are rock solid in case you're forced to present/defend them in court. Which I guess GA won't be asked to do, so... ballot shredder go BRRRRRRRR.
Got a link? I've appreciated Tucker for a while. Hell I still appreciate Shapiro even though he's missed the mark a few times (namely 2016) - I'm not about to turn on someone just because we don't see eye to eye on 100% every issue. Mark Levin, Hannity... Rush is probably the only guy I've never had reason to say "nah you're fuckin wrong about that." Probably because he tends to leave the door open on things he's not 100% sure about.
I will stop listening to them though when we come to an impasse.
* just saw the piece because I follow Tucker on Parler. He basically said Sydney wouldn't spill the beans on the evidence they had and wouldn't come on the show. He didn't cover the high-level stuff she revealed (ties to Venezuela, Soros, Clinton Foundation), which is off-kilter for him, but I wouldn't say he called her a liar or anything. Just that he was maybe a little sore she wouldn't come on the show and completely blow the trial by laying out the case they were making. Which, Tucker's a smart guy if not a lawyer, he should know better.
Sigh
Because Democrats are the legit racists.
I get so tired of saying that, and the reasons are so many and so apparent.
I was looking in Wyoming (70% Trump) and I missed Crook and Weston (east side) which are ~89 and 87, respectively. Still ~99% is unbelievable.
FWIW in a neighboring blue county that I work in, I've seen exactly 1 Biden Harris bumper sticker and probably a handful of yard signs. Meanwhile Trump-Pence signs and bumper stickers are too many to count.
Given my state was pretty strongly Trump, even the blue counties were so-tepidly Biden (in terms of real, observable support) that I can't believe that trend didn't continue, especially in areas that Trump campaigned heavily.
That's the whole thing about this election - I could accept an anomaly or two. I could accept, e.g. Biden being more popular than '08 0bama if there weren't corroborating anomalies that belie that assertion. And there are so many, just from a statistical standpoint (mail in ballots having 10-30x the acceptance rate of past elections, batches of votes with >98% Biden-only, no down-ballot votes, etc. etc.) let alone from an anecdotal/observational standpoint (Bristol boards, counting without poll watchers, etc.) that make this literally unbelievable. At this point I don't care what the courts say - this is clearly a farce. There are just way too many outlandish scenarios we're asked to believe. This is a one-in-the-life-of-the-universe possibility at this point.
Right that's 98.8% in favor of Biden. In the reddest county of the reddest state Trump didn't break 85% (which is still damn high).
This is all I've found, but I'm sure if you dug into the the 2016 election you could find the numbers yourself:
I don't give a fuck who you want to win the presidency, if this unorganized circus of a process for the election of the most powerful country in the world doesn't terrify you, then you're a moron. Every single person in the country should want a more transparent process, no matter the benefactor
This is the point I'm trying to get across as well, but people just reply "Look sweaty, sorry you wanted Orange Man to win, but there's no evidence of fraud." After I've shown them >600k illegal ballots were counted in PA, after I show them the "oopsies" in multiple counties in GA, all of the statistical impossibilities... all going in Biden's favor. "Yea well these unprecedented times sweaty."
When one side is cheating and knows they're cheating, it's impossible to call for impartiality and not be labeled an opponent of the side that cheated. I've seen too many teams lose to Ohio State at home to not know that.
It's also reminiscent of "The Great Leap Forward" and I imagine it will go about the same if executed.
The Great Reset.
Also isn't this Mr. Net Neutrality? Just goes to show what NN was really about.
As a North Floridian who only drives through Atlanta, I can agree that you have a great state. As an immigrant from the North - it's starting to look like a Chicago vs. Illinois situation. Cesspool of corruption tainting, nay, poisoning an otherwise-fantastic state.
Right? There are two possible explanations:
1.) Biden was so popular that he outperformed the most popular candidate in history (and we all lived through it - the 0bama phenomenon) by >10 million votes.
2.) Trump was so unpopular that people voted against him in droves.
Just 2 minutes of Biden talking (or the fact he couldn't pull 20k people to an online event!) will show you #1 isn't true. And every poll (which is always biased against Trump) you can look at, or the fact he regularly had >50k people turn out in person, will show you #2 isn't true.
#1 could be true if you accepted an explanation that all of those 0bama votes were actually people voting for Biden as VP, so when he became the actual candidate of course he outperformed himself as VP.
I have no fucking idea how any of this shit works
That's because it doesn't. If my ISO 17025 lab had data this obfuscated and opaque we'd have never gotten our accreditation. It's pathetic that one of our fundamental processes is so poorly tracked.
Well yea, CNN headquarters.
"Dank Web"
Slight correction - someone stole from you, then pulled a knife on you for trying to defend your property. I'm no lawyer, but that certainly sounds like armed robbery.
Jail has limited options for activity. Exercise is a good choice among the few you have.