I can't wait for the inevitable lawsuits against these organizations for all the damages they are doing to classes of Americans. Only takes one talented attorney and precedent to open the flood gates. Exorbitant punitive damages will put an end to the irresponsibility of the media, new and old. Then the disenfranchised employees can go after the leadership teams. Only a matter of time.
This is the modern equivalent of book burning- censorship because it offends or goes against the desired perspective. I'm done being the silent majority.
I will no longer support advertisers on ANY AE Networks channel, website, or media outlet, and will be making all of these organizations aware of that fact. I'll also take **every **opportunity to recommend against any AE Network product, product of their advertisers, and any affiliated investments.
It's time we start speaking with our dollars.
A&E, History, Lifetime, LMN, FYI, Vice, Biography, etc.
Looks like 2018, but there is a provision for using 2019 if 2018 is not available, un-filed, etc.
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (5), each individual who was an eligible individual for such individual’s first taxable year beginning in 2018 shall be treated as having made a payment against the tax imposed by chapter 1 for such first taxable year in an amount equal to the advance refund amount for such taxable year.
... snip...
“(5) ALTERNATE TAXABLE YEAR.—In the case of an individual who, at the time of any determination made pursuant to paragraph (3), has not filed a tax return for the year described in paragraph (1), the Secretary may apply such paragraph by substituting ‘2019’ for ‘2018’.
Assuming this is the correct bill, the "check" details which many are asking about are here:
Just skimmed it but looks like the basis is AGI for individual or Married Filing Jointly:
"Limitation Based On Adjusted Gross Income.—The amount of the credit allowed by subsection (a) (determined without regard to this subsection and subsection (f)) shall be reduced (but not below zero) by 5 percent of so much of the taxpayer’s adjusted gross income as exceeds $75,000 ($150,000 in the case of a joint return)."
If this is real, and it appears to be, than it is a MAJOR smoking gun.
Aside from some pretty typical computer security violations, the actual analysis of the Dominion software itself confirms much of what we have speculated about:
From page 18:
A high "error rate" in the election software (in this case 68.05%) reflects an algorithm used that will weight one candidate greater than another (for instance, weight a specific candidate at a 2/3 to approximately 1/3 ratio). In the logs we identified that the RCV or Ranked Choice Voting Algorithm was enabled (see image below from the Dominion manual). This allows the user to apply a weighted numerical value to candidates and change the overall result. The declaration of winners can be done on a basis of points, not votes. [Image 8]: