-1
wumao -1 points ago +1 / -2

Those are not proud boys. Notice how the "prooud boys" and antifa have the same cut out shields. Also notice how everyone who got pepper sprayed conveniently have gas masks.

13
wumao 13 points ago +13 / -0

Fact Check: While true the Democrats stuffed the ballots, Trump would not accept the legitimately faked votes.

14
wumao 14 points ago +15 / -1

Ummm... how come all the people getting pepper sprayed are wearing gas masks? What are the odds of everyone coming there with gas masks?

2
wumao 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm sure someone can do a better job at this. Please do. https://streamable.com/lx1hke

2
wumao 2 points ago +2 / -0

Honestly if someone has the ability to find out this information, they should do it regardless of payment. I will happily embark on this endeavor over the weekend. Seems like a cool puzzle.

2
wumao 2 points ago +2 / -0

Try 4chan right now.

I'm writing a paper right now for school so I'll try later, but just some introductory tips for anyone who wants to investigate:

  1. Screenshot faces that attended the rally. Make sure you crop only the face. Reverse image search using Yandex NOT Google.

  2. Refine twitter searches for Charlottesville on the date that it occurred. Log the original uploaders of some street videos.

  3. Try to find a video that shows the more high quality cameraman in the background. There were high quality videos that did not appear to be cell phones. This is suspicious.. and the cameramen are people to investigate the most.

Bonus: Once you find usernames, use this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HrqYGTK8-bo

2
wumao 2 points ago +2 / -0

I hope Trump retweets this with the caption

40 years, same speeches, same promises, NOTHING CHANGED

1
wumao 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe, but it's a preliminary thought. We need a more secure system. Mail-in voting won't cut it, and it's getting to the point where we won't have Voter-ID. There needs to be some form of verification. Blockchain is just an example of one.

26
wumao 26 points ago +27 / -1

It's been a constant back and forth with me and him. I feel like it's 2 steps forward 1.5 steps back. Everytime I change his mind on an issue, next time we talk he brings up the next Trump hoax. However I am trying to cut it off at it's source. I didn't mention this in my post, but when he brought up mail-in voting, I asked him about why we need to do it if protests are allowed.

I asked him to think about this logically. If California and other states allow mass protests, how can the same people argue about voting in person?

He's starting to see a little trend in the hypocrisy but I'm afraid something will need to spark further interest outside of our conversation before it "hits" him.

77
wumao 77 points ago +77 / -0

Mail-in voting is a zero sum game. The fraud that has occurred in the primaries sets the precedent to contest the winner on Nov 3rd for either party. There needs to be a different way instead of mail-in votes that will benefit everybody instead of hurting everybody.

^^^This is the narrative in order to change normies minds

2
wumao 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's not the point. The point is that the media is using Q regardless of whether or not it's legit to sow discourse.

0
wumao 0 points ago +1 / -1

I'm not playing this game. The left likes to say "Anonymous sources close to Trump say...."

And I will not play that game.

As far as I'm concerned, this is celebrity gossip.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›