1
wytxcook1 1 point ago +1 / -0

The number of ads on WT's site is too damned high.

5
wytxcook1 5 points ago +5 / -0

He actually looked nervous in that video. It's sad though, New Yorkers are fleeing the city, rather than marching the man responsible out of office.

I guess it really is that far gone.

4
wytxcook1 4 points ago +4 / -0

Is that a new twitter feature. Seeing it here for the second time after Goodyear used it on their "response".

2
wytxcook1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Chameleons make a nasty hissing sound when they get pissed off too. Perfectly fitting in so many ways.

5
wytxcook1 5 points ago +5 / -0

Bridgestone makes great golf balls too!

4
wytxcook1 4 points ago +4 / -0

If we start hearing James Baker's name, then you know the legal team in the FBI have rolled.

I actually like that they start with the attorneys because chances are they are where the records are actually kept. Get the legal minded guys and they'll roll on operations guys.

"I did this illegal act at the direction of Comey etc...etc..."

2
wytxcook1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Clinesmith also texted "viva la resistance" after the inauguration.

“I am so stressed about what I could have done differently,” he wrote Nov. 9, hours after Trump’s victory. “Viva la Resistance!” he texted on Nov. 22.

20
wytxcook1 20 points ago +20 / -0

And it'll be another 300 years before this country see another President like him. God's speed to us all.

7
wytxcook1 7 points ago +8 / -1

Hopefully Clinesmith rolled on James Baker.

From 2019 said by James Baker

Almost all of the top FBI officials who oversaw the Russia investigation have now publicly spoken out against Trump, an extraordinary and unprecedented rebuke of a sitting president. "There was a point in time relatively recently where I just became sick of all the BS that is said about the origins of the (Russia) investigation, and I just got fed up with it," Baker said.

"I want to talk about the origin of the investigation to reassure the American people that it was done for lawful, legitimate reasons and was apolitical throughout, in my experience."

12
wytxcook1 12 points ago +13 / -1

Just clicked on this from new and look at me now, ma! Top of T_D :)

10
wytxcook1 10 points ago +10 / -0

I'd like to see them attempt a CHAZ zone in Gun Barrel City, TX

2
wytxcook1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Article is from 2011.

Not saying they weren't fake news in those days too, but with the Dems on the attack about USPS I'm looking for information to help our arguments against expanded funding solely on the basis of increasing mail-in voting ballots.

10
wytxcook1 10 points ago +10 / -0

Maybe it was a past lie to justify more immigration, but at lease it carried with it some concept of assimilation.

This new lie is worse.

5
wytxcook1 5 points ago +5 / -0

"It's always the other organizations that have well thought-out, well researched [policies], and highly professional people," added Patty Belasalma, a former California president. "The national organization has become a way station for insecure, uncredentialed, sometimes unemployable white women.”

This is exactly what an introspective Democrat party should be saying.

8
wytxcook1 8 points ago +8 / -0

In a 1978 decision, Justice Lewis F. Powell articulated the rationale for efforts to improve academic diversity, writing, “A farm boy from Idaho can bring something to Harvard College that a Bostonian cannot offer. Similarly, a black student can usually bring something that a white person cannot offer.”

Justice Powell was a Democrat, and made an argument back then that, to me, sounds an awful lot like....

“We should challenge students in these schools,” Mr. Biden said. “We have this notion that somehow if you’re poor, you cannot do it. Poor kids are just as bright and just as talented as white kids.”

He paused, then added: “Wealthy kids, black kids, Asian kids — no I really mean it, but think how we think about it.”

34
wytxcook1 34 points ago +34 / -0

Anemona Hartocollis can't be a real name

The Justice Department’s action comes about a month before arguments are set to be heard in the appeal of the case challenging Harvard’s admissions practices. The timing is so close that the department’s finding is likely to color the debate both inside and outside of the courtroom.

They just can't help but inject their racist hubris into everything.

Initially filed in 2014, the Harvard case rests on many of the same complaints that the Justice Department leveled against Yale.

That racist Drumpf administration was around in 2014?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›