That feeling when retards genuinely think some National Guard people going off the reservation equates to a "military coup d'etat". Really? A bunch of poorly trained fat bodies who just wear the uniform are going to take over?

This is the same stupid angle that the left uses to talk about gun control. "Oh your AR-15 can't fight tanks and jets HURR DURR!" Yeah no shit, but tanks and jets aren't going to be particularly useful in a domestic gun control scenario anyway. Same with here. They have two mags of ammo and half of them aren't even wearing any plates in their vests because they're too out of shape to stand around in them for a few hours.

Texas lady says otherwise.

And that lady in Texas?

How'd that work out for the lady in Texas?

Are you thick? They're fully willing to throw their own under the bus.

But as shown, there's no ability to prosecute since there's "no standing" to bring charges.

Claiming that it wasn't the Jews that killed him is a little disingenuous considering you admit that the Sanhedrin already wanted him dead by the time he was sent before Herod Antipas and Pilate. Using the phrase "the Jews" does not necessarily equate to lumping in the entirty of the Jewish populaition.

Would the Romans have killed him without the same sentiment from Jewish authorities? Probably, but only if he demonstrated that he was a threat to their rule in the region. Sure Romans killed other Messiah claimants as well, but your own source demonstrates the key difference. The other claimants were killed only after they led armed revolts against Roman rule. As far as we can see, Jesus Christ/ of Nazareth never did so. Based on accounts from the New Testament, he never intended to, and that was part of the reason why his claim to being the Messiah is not traditionally believed.

Sure, we can sit around and circle jerk about whether Pilate's reluctance to kill Jesus was just theatrics, but what would the point of said theatrics be? Considering Jesus had broken no laws against the Roman government, there was no legitimate reason under Roman law to have him killed.

It isn't all over any media.

Provide evidence.

That's the point though. Who Charlie Kirk is or whether the question seems like low-hanging fruit is wholly irrelevant. The validity of the question is separate from the person asking it.

Do try to keep up. It isn't a particularly elaborate comparison, not sure why you're having this much trouble. Unless you're being purposefully ignorant.

You brought up the comparison being invalid in regards to the Chinese. The claim that their brand of socialism is "working" has yet to be seen. The point is that people from Venezuela (or other socialist places like Cuba) come to the US not only because they can make a better life for themselves here, but also due to proximity. If they go over land, they can pretty much walk right in.

My contention was that, if China was much closer to the US, we'd likely see millions of illegal Chinese immigrants. However, as it stands, it is much more difficult for them to immigrate to the US, legally or illegally.

Describes most of the world's militaries for the last couple of centuries. Logistics will always have a larger presence than actual fighting troops.

You're the one making claims without evidence.

Where are the deaths that you claim exist? How many are there, exactly?

Who said anything about being landlocked? Last I checked, the only two landlocked countries in the entire western hemisphere aren't the ones the US is having immigration issues with.

The point is that it it takes more effort for Chinese people to get to the US than people from anywhere in the western hemisphere. Let me know when the Mediterranean is suddenly as large as the Pacific Ocean.

This still has nothing to do with immigration. Why are people still acting as if the person saying the quote matters?

Won't hear or won't read anyway.

They more than likely won't give a fuck and wouldn't read it anyway.

"Oh but drugs in his system is no excuse!"

Bitch it ain't just about the drugs in his system. Had Chauvin been putting any weight on the man's neck, he'd have had contusions on his trachea AKA a "life-threatening injury".

OP, as in "original post".

Are you really this retarded?

No PR member of the military is anywhere near being a "highly trained killing machine". They pick up a weapon once a year at most, and likely have their range and PT cards pencil-whipped.

Half of the country already had a problem with Trump supporters and wanted them to be checked by the government, so nah, it didn't really work.

It can't be both in this case. It isn't invalid at all when looking at China because the Chinese do not have the same access to the US relative to Venezuelans, etc. Do you not think that millions of Chinese peasants wouldn't try to cross illegally into the US were the two connected by land?

Why is Lindsey Grahamn relevant here? This is about a question asked by Charlie Kirk and people are sperging out about his irrelevant personality traits instead of answering a simple yes or no question.

Almost like that should've been put in the OP, not fucking hard.

Even then, neither of those links you provided contain the quoted statements presented in the various linked articles.

Did you not cite your sources whenever you had to do research?

"Dude trust me" isn't a valid response.

"Dude trust me, I'm a random stranger on the internet. I seent it."

Yeah, sure you have. You related to Brian Williams by chance?

The only person shilling here is you. When your source consists of nothing but "Dude trust me", you're proving that you're bought and paid for.

Asking for the actual documents isn't "moving goal posts", that's just your excuse for not providing them. Back up the shit you talk or suck a dick.

You're a fucking retard. No one's calling anyone that here.

You're right, we need men, not cowards. So either put up or shut up instead of demanding that others do it for you.