-3
yesminister -3 points ago +1 / -4

Ok, so you're doing a thing. Funny. Ha ha. You're making fun of a feminist-run world where you, as a man, can't be safe anywhere. I get it. But don't forget you LITERALLY just promoted this system. You're as bad as them.

-5
yesminister -5 points ago +1 / -6

I don't care about the politically correct language you have to use in public.

Feeling someone up is not rape. It might be sexual assault, at worst.

-4
yesminister -4 points ago +1 / -5

Correct. That's not rape and should not be considered rape. Maybe learn the definition of words before you try to have an adult conversation.

-8
yesminister -8 points ago +1 / -9

What the fuck are you on about? You sound like you belong on tumblr or something. Having relations with an employee is RAPE? That's not true anywhere in the world. We would have crazy amounts of rapists then, and we would have destroyed the meaning of the word.

And no, statutory rape is not "being alone with an underage female". That would mean every parent and teacher and probably everyone else on earth is a statutory rapist.

It's not rape unless you fuck someone against their will. Biden felt her up a little and complimented her on her legs. Big fucking deal.

-4
yesminister -4 points ago +2 / -6

Huh? What rational point has been made? I must have missed that.

He said "big pharma" is an evil conspiracy that injects you with mercury to pacify you. And why do they want to pacify us? How has no one seen this except crazy anti-vaxxers? Does mercury even function that way? How big is this conspiracy that all of big pharma is in it together and zero people have turned to reveal it?

Yeah. Not rational.

I'm open to taking medication when I'm sick, despite EVIL CORPORATIONS (and I'm the leftist?) having made them.

-4
yesminister -4 points ago +2 / -6

Really? I'm a leftist because I'm not an anti-vaxxer? Do you hear yourself?

6
yesminister 6 points ago +8 / -2

Is this a catch-22? They need voter ID to prove fraud, but they don't get voter ID because they can't prove fraud.

-2
yesminister -2 points ago +1 / -3

Why do you call it rape? It wasn't rape.

-3
yesminister -3 points ago +1 / -4

Let's see. He promised to produce 500k cars in a year. That didn't happen. Is 1/10 of his promise, i.e. 50k cars, 10 times better than what other automakers produce?

Toyota produces more than 10 million cars every year. Is that 10 times worse than 50k cars? Hmmm, let me plug in those numbers in my calculator. I'll get back to you with the result!

0
yesminister 0 points ago +3 / -3

I understand. I wan them judged by the same standard too. But I want that standard to be "DON'T believe all women. Women, like men, lie all the fucking time."

-4
yesminister -4 points ago +2 / -6

Because they probably put it there for a good reason. I don't know how vaccines are made exactly, so it would be retarded for me to look at the list of "ingredients" and have opinions about it. Same goes for you.

-6
yesminister -6 points ago +1 / -7

I don't caaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaare.

So he felt up a woman five hundred years ago. That shit was barely frowned upon back then. It's not rape and it doesn't make him a bad president. Do you think he will run around-- ok, I stop myself in the middle of this sentence because yeah, he WILL probably run around feeling up women and sniffing their hair, so I'll give that point to you.

Even so, fuck women who think they can bring down powerful men decades after the fact. We, as a society, should not care about an accusation like this. Every man will be brought down by these sorts of accusations in the future, and already is to some extent.

-5
yesminister -5 points ago +2 / -7

The answer to your first question is that they didn't.

Here's the full quote (from Justice Scalia):

the Act expressly eliminates liability for a vaccine’s unavoidable, adverse side effects: “No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988, if the injury or death resulted from side effects that were unavoidable even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings

In other words, if the warnings about the side effects are properly given, the vaccine manufacturer should not be held liable for those side effects. Seems pretty reasonable, doesn't it? We all know vaccines and medication have side effects. You can't sue the company that produced your medication for a side effect it listed.

-5
yesminister -5 points ago +1 / -6

This is a pro-Elon fan club?

-4
yesminister -4 points ago +2 / -6

When have I done that? Quote me.

-5
yesminister -5 points ago +1 / -6

What have I said that is left-leaning?

I don't believe in crazy conspiracies regarding vaccinations.

I think viruses can be dangerous.

I don't believe 5G is a bad thing.

I hate Elon Musk for non-political reasons.

I don't automatically believe rape accusations just because they hurt someone I dislike.

Which of these makes me a lefty troll?

-10
yesminister -10 points ago +3 / -13

I don't know. It's probably easy to find out. Why assume it's bad?

-11
yesminister -11 points ago +2 / -13

Haha there we go. Don't hide the fact that you're an anti-vaxxer. Don't pretend you don't believe in insane conspiracy theories. Just be brave and admit it, like you did. Great!

-5
yesminister -5 points ago +1 / -6

I'm the only one here without hypocrisy, and I'm the one working for CNN? Right...

Why should we believe this slut when we didn't believe the other one? Hypocrisy.

-21
yesminister -21 points ago +3 / -24

And........? What's bad about it? Why do they want an excuse to put mercury in our bodies? Go on, spell it out.

-5
yesminister -5 points ago +2 / -7

lol "power dynamic"

Am I on reddit?

-20
yesminister -20 points ago +9 / -29

And big pharma wants to pump you full of mercury because...?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›