Truth be told, it’s not just white men though. It’s ALL men in general. The attack on masculinity is what started it all. Black men are fucked because they ‘empowered’ women via the welfare state, saying that they’ll pay women to not have a man in the home. That’s what started all the problems in the black community. And now it’s trickled down to other communities as well.
The shaming of femininity to make women more belligerent and enslave them to corporate oligarchies (“career” woman = strong woman; stay-at-home moms = demeaning; etc. ) further exacerbated the issue. It’s no wonder why the feminist movements coincided with both Red Scares. It’s Marxism seeking to subvert our nation via deceptive sloganeering in fake political movements.
Donkey dicks: i.e. they were hung like horses and virile. Big deal.
Dismissal being used as a defense mechanism because of bias. Check your ego.
baby smashing: "If I forget you, O Jerusalem, let my right hand forget its skill." is one of the most famous quotations from the bible, and is specifically cited as evidence of the continuous and historic connection of the Jewish people to Israel and Jerusalem, compared to the Muslims for whom this isn't the case. Is Jerusalem ever even mentioned in the Koran? I don't think it is. Regardless, the point is that the Jews were slaughtered and forced to flee the homeland that their God had given them. They wished death and worse upon their enemies. That is not that strange, especially back in those days. And AGAIN, I will emphasize that this is not an exhortation to Jews or Christians to be violent, and it is not interpreted as such.
killing men and taking slaves: PLEASE READ THE ENTIRE CHAPTERS. This is under a section called "Going to war". Remember that the Old Testament comes from a time when people sacrificed their children to their gods, and the Old Testament specifically put an end to that (with Abraham). It's an ancient way of thinking, and that was normal in the ancient days. Please don't be like the Leftists who judge ancient people by modern standards. As time went on Jews and Christians did not see this as a literal injunction to be followed out. Please find examples in anything like modern history where Jews or Christians have done this.
-
Muslims are a religious group, not an ethno-religious group like Jews. If you're using the excuse of "their book says that they live in the middle east", then you should also know that the Philistines, whom are mentioned in the same texts, are the same group as the Palestinians of today (hence why the etymology of the word "Palestine" & "Palestinian" sound near identical to the word "Philistine" when you trace it back and look at other languages too). Now here is the thing—the Philistines were in the region before the Jews were. This alone demolishes the argument that this is "their land". But if that's not enough, the Tanakh itself states that the Holy Land is supposed to be brought about by the Messiah himself when he comes, NOT before. This is why Orthodox Jews are anti-Zionist.
-
You're making excuses for smashing babies heads against rocks by saying that they were angry for getting slaughtered and how it's reasonable given the time period it was written (which, btw, implies that the Holy Spirit isn't timeless, or that it was written by a man not guided by the Holy Spirit...). Yet for some reason, you aren't applying the same justification to Islam. This can only mean 2 things: you either have a strong personal bias against Islam/for Israel that is clouding your judgement, or you simply lack knowledge about the context regarding those "violent" verses in the Qur'an. Or possibly both. You have to apply equal scrutiny to both sides, not just one or the other because the media says "bearded man bad" like "orange man bad", it's ridiculous.
Here's from the Koran: First of all Islam literally got spread as "the Koran or the sword", meaning you had to either convert or be killed.. There is STILL forced conversion to Islam. Modern verses of violence in the Koran More violence in the Koran. Advocates killing disbelievers wherever you find them. Instructs men to beat their wives.
This is exactly what I'm talking about; you said to me to read the whole chapter of Deuteronomy 20 because it explains the context of those verses slightly better, yet didn't do that with the "violent" verses of the Qur'an you tried sending me in the links above. From what I read, they were talking about for those who break their treaties against them, for those who attacked them first, for criminals, etc. You didn't apply scrutiny fairly. That's intellectually dishonest. The only thing that you have that could be remotely considered as "immoral" by standard Western values (which are being completely diluted btw) is the wifebeating thing, but upon further reading we find that it was addressed by Muhammad SAW in which it was explicitly stated not to cause pain or hurt them, and apparently it was allowed specifically with a toothbrush (source, scroll down to the heading "to beat them (iḍribūhunna)") and this is what all the religious scholars are saying. But yet I am supposed to believe Omnes_Omnibus over the people who literally study this their whole lives? Come on bro.
That is just the Koran, but you also have to look at what the Hadith says, which Muslims consider to be almost as holy as the Koran.
Technically no, the only holy thing there is, is the Qur'an because that's directly directly from God; the hadiths are just written texts of what someone said. There is historicity that must be applied here because not all hadith are legitimate. For example, you might find a hadith that says XYZ but was said by some dude named Tyrone. Tyrone isn't even a name that existed back then, so stuff like that is disregarded. Others are deemed to be false because someone was known to be a liar in reporting hadiths. Then there are some, like you alluded to, that are missing context in the same way you said I did. Trust me bro, I used to look at exMuslim forums for hours at a time and even went to a sheikh at a mosque to debate this stuff, it's not as simple as you think.
Did I mention that Mohammed married a 6 year old girl and had sex with her when she was 9, still played with dolls, and was (therefore) prepubescent, and that it is used practically as rationale for many Muslims to marry and have sex with children?
I used to bring this up too, but upon studying the historicity, I can tell you that she was 16, not 6. Various reasons for this, mostly other hadith that allow us to triangulate her age, but also because of issues with Shi'a (Iranians) trying to discredit her for petty things.
More important than all this is how it is actually applied. Do I need to go into examples of all the terrorist groups that are Muslim, and how they specifically cite the Koran as their guide, and pray to Allah when they kill people?
I mean they can interpret it like how the Crusaders interpreted the Bible, doesn't mean it's true lol. But that aside, Operation Cyclone is the more likely culprit here, it just doesn't make sense that ISIS had M1A2 Abrams tanks, an American tank that no other country in the world has unless we sell it to them in a weakened state. False flag galore, 9/11 was an inside job based on Operation Northwoods, and the rabbit hole goes even deeper than that. But let's not digress too much.
Or how something like 70% of Muslims in most Muslim countries approve of these terrorists, of killing non-believers, and sharia law (according to MANY polls)?
Most polls I've come across state the opposite actually but okay.
Or how there are currently THOUSANDS of honor killings where family members like fathers, mothers, brothers, uncles, kill their daughters because they were raped?
I've been to Syria like 15 years ago, and my parents to Saudi Arabia about 10. It's about as common as an American redneck who fucks his sister. Both are stereotypes of the people who live there, but it doesn't really mean it's true lol
Or how many girls are genitally mutilated, often by their mothers or grandmothers, in the name of Islam?
Yup, I remember arguing this too. It turns out that this practiced by atheists, Jews, and Christians who live in that same region (somewhere in east Africa) and has been practiced there for almost a millennia before Islam came. Even more, the movement to ban FGM was led by Muslim sheikhs, and opposed by women. So much for oppressing women lol. Funnily enough, FGM happens in Western nations at potentially even higher rates than the Middle East, but they just call it a labiaplasty rather than FGM even though it's quite literally the same exact procedure. People don't know about this though, or rather, don't like their own hypocrisy being pointed out, I suppose.
How much farther do you want me to keep going?
I can go the distance bro. I went so deep with questioning religion and theology as a whole that I ended up coming full circle. I don't believe in evolution anymore, that's how far I went. It's a lot more than most people. I even went to a mosque on several different occasions to air my grievances a little. I don't think you've done this.
If you really want to educate yourself, look into the writings of Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a former Muslim, Robert Spencer, and Islamic scholar, and Tommy Robinson who wrote a book with Peter McLoughlin called "Mohammed's Koran: Why Muslims kill for Islam". That's just the beginning.
Ayaan Hirsi Ali has immense psychological trauma from having a shitty family and pins that on Islam because they used that to justify their abuse in much the same way priests justified their molestation of altar boys with the Bible; Robert Spencer has literally no credentials and has been debunked time and time again, and even contradicts what other ACTUAL exMuslims have said about Islam; and Tommy Robinson is a political activist far more than he is any authority on religion, that's just laughable. These are all the cliche figures in the anti-Islam community dude, you can't expect me to take you seriously here (especially after posting about Robert Spencer, that guy is a joke even by standard human metrics). Since you're only on this level right now, there is one guy who makes short and concise videos debunking all this stuff. His YouTube channel is called Farid Responds. Since anti-Islam activists always use the same arguments, there is a lot of crossover between the people he refuted and those you mentioned. Enjoy.
I don't see what you're trying to say exactly
Yeah bro cuz Christians never existed in Spain after that, makes complete sense, totally, you have a very big brain, much wow, such smart.
eyeroll
It pisses me off lol these people here hate the Deep State, yet they also hate Muslims only because the Deep State told them to. Like how stupid can they get? On top of that, everything they believe in is in Islam. The more conservative and zealous they are, the more beliefs they have that align with Islam. They're practically Muslim themselves lmao
But that aside, I'm kind of a doomer. I don't think I'd fit well in with the Q crowd bc of that.
Considering that 1.8 billion Muslims exist and none of them have ever done anything against you personally, some might say so, yeah.
Nah, more like force another war. Not many people remember but there was an attempted coup Turkey several years back (during the end of Obama years). That was planned by the US. It failed because Erdogan was actually on vacation and wasn't in Turkey at the time lol but they tried to cut off his communications which is why (when you look into it) he was only able to get by through using someone else's phone and logging into his Skype to tell the people to go out on the streets to protest. When Turkey found out that it was planned by the US, that's when relations between Turkey and the US deteriorated. When Trump came along, he worked out a trade deal with them lol. People in the government (swamp) began pushing for war against them but Trump didn't know why, and actually kinda saw Erdogan as the Turkish version of himself.
People don't know this, but I do:
On the night of the coup, the mainstream media (BBC included) coordinated together to say that Turkey had a coup and that the coup was successful, that the new leader was installed, etc. to normalize him being out. It was a psyop just like they did with Trump. However, when it turned out that it failed, they quickly stopped talking about it and scrapped everything off the internet, save for a small few sources that are more akin to buzzfeed than anything (those are probably gone now, too).
It's all fucked, bro.
Can't handle the truth apparently. I bet you believe that Biden won, too.
Dissenter is better. I tried using Brave and it's nice, but not as smooth nor as fast as Dissenter for some reason.
Bro Alito and Thomas totally got blackmailed, they all did. There's no way they would cuck out this hard for no reason...
Not exactly. Syria was more so a proxy war to fight Russia (and somewhat Iran, and have an excuse to be in the Middle East further) so that the US and Russia could glass each other with nuclear weapons in order to allow China to take over. Henry Kissinger said that the China needs to lead the New World order just as the US leads the current order. So yeah....
EDIT: Turkey just became a more recent threat because they started to become more powerful and henceforth be able to exert more geopolitical influence in the region, which fucks up our plans and also Israel's (see Greater Israel project). By having that whole region in disarray, it allows for the Greater Israel project to be implemented more swiftly/easily.
Bro, you literally have the Bible talking about donkey dicks and horse semen in it, along with blessing people who smash babies against rocks. Not to mention the killing of all men and the raping of all women (and possibly children, too) being promoted, too. "Guided by the Holy Spirit", my ass. The Qur'an doesn't have anything even remotely close to that. The "violent" stuff I've read was pretty much always about self-defense or as a punishment for criminals. But apparently that's too much for some.
This is so ridiculously false that I am wondering if you have actually had an education. The Crusades were a response to the Emperor of Byzantium asking the Pope for a few hundred cavalry because some miscellaneous Kurds were running bothering them, so then the Pope amassed this huge army and called it a "Holy War" to "take back" the so-called Holy Land, all because he was power hungry (and also because Spain was getting a bit too powerful so he wanted them to attack Muslims rather than other Christians).
And he didn't even help the Byzantines, he simply just bypassed them straight to the Middle East lmao
Moving their embassy to Jerusalem isn't nearly the same as starting wars for Israel. The destabilization of the Middle East is for their Greater Israel project. Helping Iran out is just the setting up of a false flag, the uniparty already wanted to go to war against them for years.
Judaism is DEFINITELY #1. You don’t see Muslims owning mass media corporations to disseminate propoganda, or blackmail like Rod Rosenstein, or become investment bankers and hedge fund managers that try to manipulate the stock markets, or try to become lawyers and judges to corrupt the legal system in the US.
These are all Jewish stereotypes. These are also all the people that we have a problem with in the world right now.
That’s simply paying lip service to them for the sake of foreign relations. Biden literally called for a “regime change” in Turkey. They want to have an excuse to stay in the ME.
Tf are you talking about? Everything in Islam that you hate is amplified tenfold in Christianity. Anyone who has engaged in polemics to ANY extent will tell you that.
Islam was never a problem till Western countries subverted them started bombing the absolute shit of them.
Gonna hijack this so people see:
Biden stated in one of his speeches that he wants a “regime change” in Turkey a while back.
Jus an FYI.
That map shows how the electoral map would look like, dumbass. Using all caps doesn’t make your point any less irrelevant. I suggest you come back once you can engage in discourse like a normal person.
It was. But let's not deny reality.
Th early 1900s was when the seeds for corruption first began to take root. You had first-wave feminism, the First Red Scare, the establishment of the Federal Reserve, the implementation of credit from banks, and the 17th amendment (it made the voting of senators a direct vote rather than via state legislatures; this makes it easier to corrupt the senate because most people are idiots who will vote for whoever the media says to vote for and have no business in politics, and also because it made senators beholden to the people financing their campaigns).
One thing that I find particularly interesting is how feminism coincided with the First Red Scare. Communism, a liberal ideology, promotes that everyone is the same (i.e. "equal") and always promotes feminism; it's not a coincidence that the Red Scare and first-wave feminism came with each other. The US really did begin to be infiltrated then.
The funniest part about all of it is that feminism completely died down once the Great Depression hit. Can't have equal rights between men and women when times are tough lol.
Bro I live in one of the best counties in all of the US and there are tons of Syrians who live here, you're talking out of your ass lmao