I hate both of the Bush's, but Obama was worse imo. And FDR and Woodrow Wilson were even worse further. I seriously don't know who was worse, Wilson or FDR.
This.
You can't just discount these people. They've shown that they want to kill us for our beliefs and values, and they've even succeeded at times. We can't just let them walk around after all they've done. They are the army of the Deep State bureaucrats and need to be dealt with as such.
Did you not sleep just cuz you didn't feel sleepy and felt great or just cuz it screwed up your sleep cycle?
American foreign policy for the last 50 years has been "we're gonna FORCE you to be free whether you like it or not!" (but don't you dare use that freedom in a way we dislike).
She's not allowed back in the WH? Since when? And why??
What exactly is to come then? We know SCOTUS was threatened, maybe Pence underwent the same thing.
Doesn’t matter. There were rumors about China seeking world domination and howbthey were explicitly building up their navy to fight ours, the intelligence community knew about it for decades, but no one did shit to stop it (fuck you Kissinger!). It’s still good to write a letter of sorts to the Secret Service (even though a lot of them aren’t on our side). That’s what I did anyway lol
Why is the 9th going to be considered an uprising? Why not the 6th?
Some things to consider:
- Pence was planning on leaving the country on the 6th. Apparently he’s going to Israel, but I’m wondering if that’s an excuse to simply leave the country? You’d have to wonder why...but then again, why Israel of all places? Hmmm....
- Chris Miller also took a special liking to Pence in regards to covert operations that were being planned. Most people lean towards liking Miller.
Sorry, I meant the panic of 1907. I know who created the Fed and the powers that be who are behind it, that’s common knowledge for anyone who’s gone down this rabbit hole at all. But how did JP Morgan (and I’m assuming other bankers were in on this, too) artificially create the panic?
Thanks bro. How exactly did they create it though? I thought it came about via credit.
What happens if we were to nationalize the Fed?
Yup. And they didn’t have mail-ins either that they could bullshit with.
Well they helped kill Kennedy so I don’t think they’ve ever been on our side to begin with. We can agree to disagree.
How would you go about doing that though? And wouldn't that also destroy the USD since nations around the world buy it for oil?
I think it was the hubris of the Deep State.
Man if we're gonna go to war with Iran, it needs to be a total war type scenario. None of this half-ass crap like we've been doing the last 20+ years where we send JUST enough force to destabilize the region but not enough to fully control it. That's exactly why we've been stuck in the middle east for decades.
Wow. That's really ingenious when you think about it.
So once you believe we are at that box, do you really believe you can organize everyone and everything instantaneously? Planning logistics takes time.
Worked when antifa and BLM did it. If we do it, there's no way they can ignore us. This is what will spark the revolution in our favor.
I mean at this point, you're either with us or against us. If you haven't picked a side by now, then you probably never will.
Woah there Nelly, we still don't have enough information on this to reach a logical conclusion just yet. Perhaps the autists on 4chan could do some digging....
Stuxnet would be classified, imo as a random internet stranger, as a cyberattack. I don't know what Brain is, but everything else you said was espionage though, or (in the case of a the Morris Worm), a lone graduate student trying to have fun when the internet was in its infancy. Again, spying may be apart of a cyberattack, but a cyberattack in and of itself is not spying. To say otherwise would be like saying all cars are Ferraris because all Ferraris are cars; it's a false equivalency. Cyber espionage is not the same as a cyberattack. Digital tradecraft ≠ cyberattack. I don't know how many other ways I can say it.
Also, anything related to the NSA is mostly espionage and encryption oriented. The NSA doesn't really conduct cyberattacks like that, I believe that is the job of USCYBERCOM. Just for future reference.
Thx about the McD’s thing, I didn’t know cuz I hear all the time about people suing for stupid shit so it just jaded me.
Why exactly would we want to give them more things to sue over/a greater ability to sue people?
Even though Bush had a meeting at the WTC scheduled for a year before, and then literally on 9/10, he cancelled it. Just for lulz, amirite?
And how an insurance policy was "mysteriously" taken out right before the planes hit, making the owner of (iirc) Building 7 stupidly rich (of course he was Jewish).
What about the thermite dust/powder found in the rubble?
Or the numerous witness testimonials from first responders of a separate explosion on the first floor of one of the buildings acting as a pre-weakening of the foundations, which is done during planned demolitions?
How about how BBC reported Building 7 had collapsed before it actually did?
Or how the engineers & architects who constructed the buildings specifically designed them to be able to withstand bombings and terror attacks?
Or how the US had planned the same exact thing against Cuba in Operation Northwoods where hijacking airplanes was proposed?
Or how JFK was killed because he shot down the idea of killing Americans in Operation Northwoods and was then duly assassinated in part because of it; this is a whole other rabbit hole in and of itself?
How far down the rabbit hole do you wanna go, Alice?