Well Hongcouver

Has CNN said we can read it?

When not if, like Twitter banning his account

Hope they have a solid back-up

for example

RULE 3.3: CONDUCT BEFORE A TRIBUNAL -- (f) In appearing as a lawyer before a tribunal, a lawyer shall not: .. (2) engage in undignified or discourteous conduct

I am biased but I think people should be accredited and licensed to practice law

Tell that to my bar associations... Not only would I get nowhere with the judge, it would also be a headache from ethics

You mistyped riot

New accounts get a handshake icon by their name for a while

I know some wealthier people in Monterrey and they aren't necessarily rich in the global sense, but damn do they have a nice comfortable life there. Good schools, domestic help, nice houses, vacations, nice social circle with good clubs and restaurants. If you avoid the cartels and pollution it can be solid.

Like many law students they miss the subtleties of arguments, which loose constructionism can entice people to do

"the election"

I'm not upvoting this because I never liked the guy and want to never see his name/face again thanks

Oh shit don't say this on Youtubbbbbeeeee because it's debooooonkfreeezone

It is fairly common to have a team work on briefs, then a good orator to present. Though it is going to be a person who knows the arguments inside and out, since you have to answer questions on your feet.

CNN didn't report it so why would I need to check the court website /s

This site is a riot

No standards except for double standards

Your reply doesn't have much to do with my reply so don't expect a reply to whatever you reply to this with but on this new topic: they are more auditors so this doesn't compromise any of their clients

Pretty reputable actually, lots of talent

Information dominance ... It isn't pleasant but it is working for them

If you aren't banned or permanently suspended from that shithole, go drop some red pills then bail. Also I nuked 6+ years of comments and links on the way out, because screw them. If you have a high-karma account and want things nuked PM me for help if you aren't able to use the shreddit script.

Maybe it was someone's dying wish that be ignored

China being China in China isn't news

Article III, Section 2, Clause 1.. SCOTUS can take the case, but they can also decline the case

Walk softly

Big stick

Edit: also "“Never attempt to win by force what can be won by deception”