25
zuccherina 25 points ago +25 / -0

That's because there is no exact procedure. Read about the craziness in 1876. They had such a hard time figuring it out, a president wasn't decided until March 4!

1
zuccherina 1 point ago +1 / -0

Even if she were republican, she's not conservative and could never win the presidency on a purely antiwar platform. Imo she hasn't found her niche yet.

11
zuccherina 11 points ago +11 / -0

This was reported to be a risk limiting audit, which would have been better than signature match. Instead it turned into a hand recount, proving SOS Benson lied again.

10
zuccherina 10 points ago +10 / -0

This was done in Georgia by Kemp already. He claimed he was doing a risk limiting audit, oops he meant recount, oops he meant audit, oops that should've been a hand recount!

by shocked
1
zuccherina 1 point ago +1 / -0

It was supposed to be a risk limiting audit that would take a small number of perfect ballots and audit them. If you find issues with perfect ballots, you can get a feel for how the election went in the rest of the county and even state - it's a really good indicator of whether or not fraud occurred.

What this article fails to point out, is that an SOS official would not allow auditors to challenge ballots or set anything aside. They were told to hurry up and count. So it became nothing more than a hand recount, which is of course useless if you're counting fraudulent ballots. If your control group is tainted, you're in big trouble. Try 138 ballots with possibly the same handwriting.

3
zuccherina 3 points ago +3 / -0

Looks like they're trying to cap hhs powers with a separate bill. I hope so!

1
zuccherina 1 point ago +1 / -0

She doesn't even have to go that far. They are simply challenging those ballots and want to set them aside to be checked. Not even allowed to do that! Then DePerno is right, it's just a fucking hand recount, meaningless, and we were lied to when told it would be a risk limiting audit. See, Kemp did the exact same thing in Georgia, so Benson decided to copy him.

2
zuccherina 2 points ago +3 / -1

It appears to be one of many holiday parts at the White House. Trump was not present at this one. His was on the 11th.

1
zuccherina 1 point ago +1 / -0

Reading Dan Simmons' "Carrion Comfort". He talks about this phenomenon in depth. Fascinating read! Would encourage anyone not afraid of a little horror to dive in. It was published in 2009 and also discusses Epstein and the Metoo abuses.

1
zuccherina 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've been reading. It looks like alternate electors already have us in new territory. Can the President of the Senate pick which envelope of elector votes to open? No one knows. If he opens envelopes for Trump, will it instantly go into a contest and everyone will have to publicly vote whether or not to keep those votes or toss them? If they toss them, can they choose the other envelope, or do we now have fewer votes to get to 270? What happens if we don't get to 270?

1
zuccherina 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's questionable. With alternate electors, we're already in uncharted territory. There's no clarity on whether or not Pence picks which elector envelope to open.

4
zuccherina 4 points ago +4 / -0

Look into The Fourth Turning. It's an interesting theory on a 4 generation cycle. The cycle is created by parents/society going through world events and raising their kids to create the next generation in the cycle. It's fascinating. You have parents living through war, insulating their children, who are rule followers, who have children who feel repressed and act out and rebel, who raise spoiled children who require revolutionaries, their own children, to fix the problems the last two generations created.

40
zuccherina 40 points ago +41 / -1

That is the dumbest shit I've maybe ever seen. And that's saying a lot.

1
zuccherina 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nope, and nope. He stopped smoking and it went away. It's too bad it was so easy the doctor couldn't help him. 😐

1
zuccherina 1 point ago +1 / -0

I mean, I can't paint with a broad brush because I know people serve in these positions and we are all different. But there's a reason I had two hospital births and went on to do two home births. A midwife I paid out of pocket for was way more attentive to my needs, my health, my vitamin intake, my stats and my preferences and personality. I wasn't pushed around and had two wonderful births! Imagine, a healthy low-risk woman can get care that doesn't revolve around hospital liability.

My husband went to the doctor a couple years ago for restless leg syndrome and the guy told him to google some leg stretches and charged him. Ridiculous.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›